What happens to the debt in an acquisition?

7
debt
jf3 asked:


When company A pays a 15% premium to acquire the stock of company B, what happens to the debt of commpany B? Does company A absorbed the debt, pay it off? Is company B responsible for paying it off?

Comments on What happens to the debt in an acquisition? Leave a Comment

February 14, 2010

Steve H @ 10:45 am #

Unless otherwise specified in a contract, Company A bought the debt, too.

February 16, 2010

bostonianinmo @ 2:54 pm #

Company A gets the debt as well. When you buy a company, you get it all. The good, the bad, and the ugly.

February 18, 2010

Rabbit @ 5:30 pm #

In some cases, the premium is not so much buying incentive but to pay off the more onerous of debts the other company incurs. Sometimes the merger bargaining involves discussion of what to do with the debts.

Mergers can be a combining of peers, but usually a company subsumes another. The company taken over often had inferior resources to work with, including capital and debt issues. I’ve seen things where some units, say a region of stores were to be sold to pay off a debt issue that the buying company found disagreeable. Of course, they will also do that for other issues, such as one store chain I know sold its stores in a certain state because the union contract there held wages too high for their preferred model.

February 20, 2010

vegas_iwish @ 3:47 pm #

A assumes it.

February 21, 2010

gregory_dittman @ 3:45 am #

A takes on the debt, but then they could spin off a business, tack on the debt and have the other company declare bankrupcy (I heard that SLE tacked on their debt to the spin off company HBI).

February 23, 2010

knihelpu @ 8:58 pm #

If it is a 100% buyout, the debt goes with the company. So B would be responsible for all of A’s liabilities.

If it’s not a 100% buyout, then the debt could stay with A, go to B, or be split, depending on the deal they make.

February 25, 2010

Mathew C @ 2:42 am #

There are two options. The acquiree pays off the debt before handing over the compay to the acquirer or the acquirer assumes the debts of the acquiree which is the more prevelent route. The acquirer finds ways to manage the debt acquired from the cash tranche the acquiree has or by selling off it’s assets or other cash generating strategies which it conjures up before acquisition. That is why many hybrid LBO’s fail because of the ‘poison pill route’ the acquiree takes when a hostile take over happens. In the 80′s the takeover of CBS by Ted Turner was thrwted by Lawrence Tisch the then Chairman of CBS this way.

Leave a Comment

Fields marked by an asterisk (*) are required.